Measuring HDI – The Old, the New and the Elegant: Implications for multidimensional development and social inclusiveness

Srijit, Mishra and Nathan, Hippu Salk Kristle (2014) Measuring HDI – The Old, the New and the Elegant: Implications for multidimensional development and social inclusiveness. Working Paper. London School of Economics and Political Science, London.

[img] Text
2014-WP63-MishraNathan.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (697kB)
ContributionNameEmail
Official URL: http://www.lse.ac.uk/asiaResearchCentre/_files/ARC...
Related URLs:
    Abstract: The Human Development Index (HDI) is calculated using normalized indicators from three dimensions- health, education, and standard of living (or income). This paper evaluates three aggregation methods of computing HDI using a set of axioms. The old measure of HDI taking a linear average of the three dimensions satisfies monotonicity, anonymity, and normalization (or MAN) axioms. The current geometric mean approach additionally satisfies the axiom of uniformity, which penalizes unbalanced or skewed development across dimensions. We propose an alternative measure, where HDI is the additive inverse of the distance from the ideal. This measure, in addition to the above-mentioned axioms, also satisfies shortfall sensitivity (the emphasis on the neglected dimension should be at least in proportion to the shortfall) and hiatus sensitivity to level (higher overall attainment must simultaneously lead to reduction in gap across dimensions). These axioms make an acronym MANUSH and its anagram is HUMANS. Using Minkowski distance function we also give an α-class of measures, special cases of which turn out to be the old linear averaging method (α=1) and our proposed displaced ideal measure (α=2) and when α≥2 then the MANUSH axioms turn out to be both necessary and sufficient. From the perspective of HDI indicating direction of future progress: α=1 can be identified with translation invariance (equal attainment across dimensions in future, independent of historical antecedents), α→∞ can be identified with a Rawlsian leximin ordering, and α=2 will be an intermediary position between the two that satisfies shortfall sensitivity weakly.
    Item Type: Monograph (Working Paper)
    Additional Information: Copyright belongs to Publisher
    Keywords: Displaced ideal, Hiatus sensitivity to level, MANUSH, Minkowski distance, Shortfall sensitivity, Uniform development
    Subjects: School of Natural and Engineering Sciences > Energy
    Divisions: Schools > Natural Sciences and Engineering
    Date Deposited: 15 Sep 2015 09:27
    Last Modified: 15 Sep 2015 09:27
    URI: http://eprints.nias.res.in/id/eprint/775

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item